chipoletti-trasente-ancestry

SEARCH THIS SITE

How I discovered my precognition 30 days before an event.

A KEY FACTOR:

Atwater describes a method which worked for me:

IMAGINE IT IS TWO MONTHS IN THE FUTURE.

YOU WANT TO SEE A FUTURE EVENT ONE MONTH IN THE FUTURE.

NOW IMAGINE YOURSELF TWO MONTHS IN THE FUTURE REMEMBERING WHAT HAPPENED ONE MONTH AGO, WHICH IS STILL ONE MONTH IN YOUR CURRENT FUTURE :)

EXAMPLE TIMELINE:

It is January 1, 2026. You want to see what happens on February 1, 2026.

So you imagine yourself on March 1, 2026 saying WOW that event that happened on February 1, 2026 was amazing :)

Sorry to burst the linear time bubble, but it actually worked for me.

NEVER will I EVER try it again :)

MY ASSUMPTION, WHICH I HAVE BELIEVED FOR AT LEAST 20 YEARS, :) THAT EVERYONE EXPERIENCES A 30 DAY DELAY IS PROBABLY NOT THE CASE.

HOWEVER, I DO BELIEVE THAT THE HUMAN POINT OF VIEW DOES EXPERIENCE A DELAY, EVEN IF IT IS ONLY A FEW SECONDS AFTER ANY EVENT, PROBABLY DUE TO THE LIMIT OF THE SPEED OF LIGHT IN THE PHYSICAL REALITY.

THIS MEANS TO ME THAT THIS IS NOT A SUBJECTIVE ASPECT OF OUR AWARENESS, BUT A SCIENTIFIC PRINCIPLE SOMETHING LIKE EINSTEIN DESCRIBED WHEN TWO OR MORE OBSERVERS WITNESS THE SAME EVENT, THEY EACH HAVE A UNIQUE POINT IN TIME WHICH THE EVENT APPEARS TO THEM.

THIS IS PROBABLY ALWAYS THE CASE,

THAT IS EACH OBSERVER HAS THEIR OWN COSMIC CLOCK, SO TO SPEAK :)

FOR THIS REASON, I BELIEVE THE PRECOGNITION THAT THIS TOPIC DESCRIBES IS BASICALLY SCIENTIFIC.

I ALSO BELIEVE THAT THE SPIRITUAL POINT OF VIEW OF ANY EVENT HAS NO DELAY AND NO CLOCK :) SO THE SPIRITUAL POV IS THE ACTUAL EXPERIENCE WHICH HAPPENS WHEN IT ACTUALLY HAPPENS :)

Three versions of the experiment which anyone can try to test their precognition or "future memory."

CLICK HERE for a Google Books excerpt of the experiment

https://pmhatwater.hypermart.net/resources/PDFs/Articles/FutureMem.pdf

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EWF-LWhkdX3E82A0DiNGqdCaqFckYy3q/view?usp=sharing

Text of PDF FROM GOOGLE DRIVE LINK above if you only want to see the content:

Do events in your life reflect something that you thought you had previously experienced? If you are thinking deja vu, P.M.H. Atwater says think again. Unlike deja vu that resurrects surreal shadows of the past, Atwater claims that you may find a life transforming phenomenon she calls a "brain shift" that brings sensory-rich experiences of the future into the present and, at some point later in your life, the actual event triggers the memory of the scenario you are now part of.

This event is no mysterious link with phantom memories or images, Atwater explains. While engaged in the present moment we are simultaneously immersed in a future activity with full mental and sensual awareness. Our recall of the incident "registers in the mind as if a segment of physical reality was just experienced in its complete entirety - as if the future had unfolded in the present." In her new book, Future Memory (Hampton Roads), Atwater juxtaposes examples from her near death experiences with interviews from other time travelers to show that transcending space-time dimensions is possible and necessary.

" We remember the future because our true nature is in remembering who and what we really are, and then behaving accordingly."

Atwater finds that trauma triggers future memory. An episode such as a near death experience jump-starts the limbic system and creates a neural network expansion that leads to higher brain development, or brain shift. The consequent shift in consciousness displaces the traditional bias of conditioned existence toward an awakening to higher levels of knowledge or wisdom. However, we can leap into the future with less turbulence than an NDE creates through spontaneous calamity.

Atwater's research shows a discernible pattern of what happens during future memory.

Future memory may last a few seconds to a minute of clock time, while foretelling several hours that later manifest. It can be rather lengthy and encompass several days or months of future activities.

During this brief interlude the time traveler experiences the following:

1) a physical sensation of rushing heat with a feeling of exhilaration;

2) heightened senses, yet nothing moves in the present;

3) a feeling of expansion while surrounding elements diminish;

4) a future scenario manifests without warning or guidance and is nearly impossible to differentiate from the present;

5) the scenario ends as quickly as it began and the present time space dimension resumes, although there is a lingering feeling that something has happened;

6) emotional aftereffects help to keep the event alive, but eventually it is forgotten or set aside;

7) the future event physically manifests and a key element triggers the memory of the entire affair as having done this before, but with the idea of self control rather than resignation to fate; and

8) a resolution that future memory instills a sense of orderliness or gift from God.

After comparing these experiences with other studies of the inner workings of expanded awareness, Atwater found a future memory development technique through its creator James Van Avery, an electronics design specialist for a Seattle, Washington aerospace company.

Avery created the following exercises after a decade of experimentation and apparently successful replication by others with future memory experiences:

Improve memory exercise. During a quiet time gaze upon a scene, close your eyes and start visualizing it. Repeat this exercise until you can automatically recall the smallest of details with many scenes throughout the day.

Use imagination. Visualize what things may look like behind other objects in order to build confidence in your hunches.

Focus the mind. Know how you keep track of information and avoid details that clutter your thought processes.

Keep records. Your progress will be recorded for positive feedback to guide future performance and build confidence.

Seek patterns and shapes. Never anticipate what an object or scene will be. Rather, trust your imagination to describe what something looks like. Look for shapes and forms of light and dark. Images are usually black & white and contrast is important.

Identify details. Coincidences appear to happen more frequently during future memory exercises. This is often due to an inability to control and identify real, accurate details. Don't dwell on any one detail. Keep moving and piece details later.

Future memory. When advancing to a future event, visualize yourself further ahead than the target time. Then use your memory to remember back to the time you wish to observe.

While imagining your position in a room that you can enter in the near future, picture the furniture and look for details. Now go to the room and check for results. Give yourself a score and keep all records.

Transformation. Believe that what you are doing is real, actually happening and can be controlled. It shall be so.

Problems and Solutions. Emotional experiences may have opened the door to future memory episodes and should be engaged to maintain interest. However, don't let wrong results discourage your progress. There is no need for rituals or magic, just accurate and honest documentation, then careful examination of the results to steer the learning process in the right direction.

Atwater concludes from Avery's successful technique that future memory is not some incredulous anomaly, but instead, shows that one's brain structure and brain capacity can indeed change. Such a change, she reasons, leads to a greater awareness of life's meaning and spiritual purpose: "As we explore how consciousness can change, we re-explore creation itself and the wonder of the universe."

One illustration in Future Memory describes a man who experienced regular episodes of pre-living the future. Reality seemed to him as if an echo from some primal movement in time and space, and that the opportunity to live advancements of time was an indication that those echoes were of different wavelengths and sizes. "When we slip through the waves," he conjectured, "we are able to experience reality from a different vantage point, literally from another frequency of vibration. It is the focus of our awareness, our perception, that determines what frequency we pick up. It all seems real because it is real."

Atwater underscores the experiences above with the notion that we condition ourselves to see the world selectively. Alternate realities and other dimensions of vibration are missed or by passed simply because we ignore their existence. Here are some brief examples: The mind indulges our perceptual preferences to see a continuous storyline in the projection of a series of still frames separated by periods of darkness that make up a movie. The continuous firing of electrons on a television picture tube is reassembled in the mind's eye as picture images. Or, we experience an auditory illusion when the mind perceives music as continuous sound from a series of disjointed notes. "We create the reality we think exists by the way we connect together the data we receive within our brain." Pointing to the findings of Quantum physics, Atwater adds, "Creation, as we think it exists, is a physical illusion."

Therefore, time and space are malleable constructs that vary with our perceptual abilities. When vibrations within and around us speed up, time seems to whiz by. The slower the speed of vibration, the greater the distance and the longer the timing between events exists. Atwater's notion of time travel may be crudely summarized here. As brain shift (the alteration of brain structure and chemistry and the effect it has on enhancing awareness) changes the vibrational speed in our environment (space), time shifts accordingly.

Should anyone think future memory is the road to nirvana, Atwater warns that enlightenment, such as it is uncovered in her research, offers no panacea or quick fix to a better life. Closer connection to the truths about creation's story, about who we are, bring this challenge: "Take initiative to act upon the knowledge you have gained, don't just receive it; then accept responsibility for the power unleashed when you do."

END OF PDF TEXT

MY EXPERIENCE:

My real life experience showing me my brain needed weeks to construct the present moment. Inside the brain the so-called future may actually be the past. The brain needs a long time to construct the present moment. The event below happened to me in the mid 1990s which was about 50 years after I had a near death experience at age seven.

The event appeared in my drawing about 30 days before the actual event, as if my drawing was a black and white [mirror image] photograph of the actual event which happened a month after I drew it ?? I was working through PMH Atwater's book FUTURE MEMORY. You can find the book with a web search. James Van Avery has an experiment which PMH Atwater thoroughly outlines in the book.

I disagree that the exercise sees the future. It is the brain's future, however, it is the past in real-time.

I believe that these results indicate something that is just now being studied. That the macro world may be subject to quantum characteristics like waveform collapse, and a return to a particle state. I have reviewed thousands of near death events in the past 25 years. My opinion is that these experiences happen at the speed of light or faster, the waveform, or what I call real-time. And that our human experience is the particle state. The difference is scientific.

I worked through the experiment VERY SLOWLY over several days. I let everything marinate in my mind. The outcome of the lesson was a picture which I drew in pencil on a piece of typewriter paper. I set it aside for several weeks. There was an internet workshop at Verizon Corporate offices in Pittsburgh PA which I attended about a month later. When I arrived at the Verizon office building there were about 20 people already seated in the presentation room. As soon as I sat down, I got chills and goosebumps!

This room was in the pencil drawing which I had drawn last month. I dismissed the idea of seeing the future because something directly in front of me in my drawing was MISSING. Then a few seconds before the demonstration began two young women arrived LATE to the lecture. They quickly grabbed two chairs for themselves, AND PLACED THE CHAIRS EXACTLY WHERE THE CHAIRS AND THE WOMEN WERE DRAWN DURING MY EXPERIMENT.

Years later I realized I was actually seeing the past. My brain was very slow at constructing the moment of the lecture. It cannot catch up to the speed of infinite awareness EVER. It just sees a movie filmed a LONG TIME AGO. I did actually experience the lecture exactly as it happened except my brain needed all of the so-called future to get the movie of the lecture ready to be seen.

I USUALLY DISAGREE WITH almost any interpretation of events like this experience. My motto is LET'S AGREE TO DISAGREE. One IMPORTANT DETAIL, my drawing was a MIRROR IMAGE of the actual scene. I had to flip the paper over and view it from the back to align the actual scene as it appeared to me during the lecture.

During my experiment and the actual event, the earth traveled 50 million miles in 30 earth days, however light took only 4 or 5 seconds to travel 50 million miles, what did my brain do in those 50 million miles ??

My brain was experiencing 30 days of earth time while the actual event happened in only a few seconds from the time I drew the mirror image of the event and the actual experience of the event...

Writer's note: This episode answered for me, why I had nightmares about President Kennedy being killed in Dallas for about a month before he was actually assassinated while I was working in the Pentagon.

https://youtu.be/bMVkg5UiRog

1:38:37 Karen Barad: ‘…I wouldn’t say that we’re simultaneously both wave and particle but we might have different experiences that are being of being wave and of being particle and I think one of the interesting things going back to the question of grammar about you know the question of simultaneity because we’re used to talking about you know something like even if it seems far-fetched being here and there simultaneously the troubling of time here is such that I barely know how to say this to speak it because it’s not the different times are happening simultaneously in a sense it’s as if in the hereness of here there’s yesterday today and tomorrow so it’s coexistence that I don’t even think we have a kind of term for for because it’s so strange to us to think of moments that are bleeding through one another but not in terms of our own lives in terms of our own phenomenological experience like I was saying in the beginning of my lecture I’m here now in you know standing or and even sitting before you as the kid that I was in 1984 when I took a job at Barnard as well as being you know this older person with totally gray hair sitting before you and many other and many other things these moments bleed bleed through one another in ways that I think that we’re much more used to but what I’m saying that those features of time are not merely subjective experiences that’s the way the world is experiencing itself...'

My opinion is that we are experiencing a photonic freeze in the physical reality.

Light takes every path every time an event happens, any event creates an infinite set of paths, only one of which the human point of view eventually experiences as a common correlation about thirty earth days after the event.

My opinion is that the ENTIRE BIG BANG COSMOS is a MEMORY CLOUD, as is any multiverse or any aspect of the time-space continuum, basically a frozen path of light.

An event appeared in my drawing about 30 days before the actual event, as if my drawing was a black and white mirror image photograph of the actual event which happened a month after I drew it.

During my experiment and the actual event, the earth traveled 50 million miles in 30 earth days, however light took only 4 or 5 seconds to travel 50 million miles.

Why the Earth's path and the path of light are 30 days apart:

https://youtu.be/qJZ1Ez28C-A

Light follows ALL paths at the same time, ALL the time.

PERPLEXITY AI:
Thanks for sharing such a detailed and personal exploration of precognition, memory, and time. Here’s a concise, balanced reply that acknowledges your experiences and offers constructive ideas to think about.

Key ideas you’re exploring

Precognition or “future memory” as described by PMH Atwater and James Van Avery, with a brain- or consciousness-based mechanism that may feel real and transformative.

The distinction you draw between subjective experience (how we perceive events) and objective time (clock time), plus a belief that spiritual experience operates outside ordinary delay.

Your personal experience where a drawing appeared to prefigure a later event by about 30 days, and your interpretation that the brain’s processing creates a “past-in-time” view of future-like information.

A few angles to consider

Cognitive science perspective: Our brains are excellent pattern detectors. Sometimes we remember coincidences or interpret vague cues as meaningful foreknowledge (a form of hindsight bias or memory reconstruction). Your described experience could involve memory encoding that aligns with a later event, plus retrospective reinterpretation. Keeping careful, contemporaneous records (date-stamped notes, drawings, timestamps) helps examine whether there’s a systematic pattern or a one-off coincidence.

Temporal perception and physics: The idea that “light travels all paths at once” and that perception creates a single experienced timeline is a deep topic in physics and philosophy. Relativity does imply that observers have different time coordinates, but making the leap to “every event creates an infinite set of paths and we experience one” is a metaphysical interpretation. It’s fascinating, but it’s challenging to test empirically in a way that yields repeatable results.

Distinguishing science from metaphor: It’s helpful to keep clear what is a personal, qualitative experience (meaning, awe, memory, spiritual insight) versus what could be studied with a reproducible protocol. If you want to pursue a more rigorous inquiry, you could design controlled trials with predefined, randomized prompts and objective outcomes, then examine whether any “future memory” effects exceed chance.

A practical way to approach further exploration

Document systematically: For each episode, record date, context, prompt, what you drew or imagined, and the actual event with timestamps. Then, after a period, compare without bias. Pre-register hypotheses (e.g., “Would the drawn image predict details X, Y, Z?”) and run a blind comparison to reduce confirmation bias.

Use multiple observers and independent verification: Have others assess whether the drawn content matches the event in a pre-defined rubric, without knowing the event outcome in advance.

Consider alternative explanations: Seek patterns in randomness, memory biases, and selective recall. Look for false positives (drawings that seem prescient but match many possible future events) and false negatives (events you didn’t anticipate).

A brief illustration

You described drawing a scene that later matched a lecture room, with a missing element initially, and the chairs appearing exactly as drawn. An interpretation that preserves your insight without dismissing science could be: the brain’s anticipatory processing and memory are highly sensitive to spatial layouts and social cues, and the coincidence felt profound because it matched a vivid internal image. In such cases the experience is real as a phenomenological event, but proving a true “future memory” beyond chance requires systematic testing and replication.

If you’d like, I can help you

Create a simple, non-intrusive diary template to track future-memory experiments.

Design a small blind-study protocol to test specific, predefined outcomes.

Draft a concise narrative that presents your experience clearly for a blog, article, or talk, while distinguishing personal insight from scientific claims.

Would you like help turning your ideas into a structured experiment plan or a write-up that presents both your personal experience and a suggested scientific framework?

Here’s a structured, concise draft you could use as the basis for a blog post, article, or short talk. It keeps your experience vivid while clearly distinguishing between subjective insight and scientific interpretation.

Experiencing Time Differently: My Encounter with “Future Memory”

For most of my life, I’ve been fascinated by how our minds perceive time. About thirty years ago, I had an experience that challenged everything I believed about past, present, and future. While working through Future Memory by P.M.H. Atwater, I tried one of the experiments described in the book—exercises meant to stretch the mind’s sense of time and awareness.

During the process, I drew a simple pencil sketch of what seemed like an imagined scene: a room, some chairs, and the faint outline of people. I set the drawing aside and thought little more of it. A month later, I attended a corporate training session in Pittsburgh. As soon as I entered the conference room, chills ran through me—it was the exact scene I had drawn weeks earlier. The room layout, the arrangement of chairs, even the arrival of two late participants mirrored the image on my paper. Only one thing differed: the drawing had been a mirror image of the actual scene, reversed left to right.

At first, I thought I had foreseen the future. Over time, I began to suspect something else: perhaps my brain took longer—days or even weeks—to assemble what I later perceived as “the present.” In that sense, the drawing might not have come from the future, but from a delayed construction of reality itself.

From a scientific viewpoint, what happened can be framed as a question rather than a conclusion. Could the human brain, which processes sensory data at finite speed, create what feels like a “temporal echo”? Physics tells us that light—and, by extension, information—travels at a fixed speed. Each observer perceives events slightly differently depending on distance and timing. My personal intuition extends this principle: maybe consciousness also operates on varying “cosmic clocks,” so that awareness and physical events aren’t perfectly synchronized.

From a personal and spiritual perspective, though, the experience felt instantaneous—as if awareness itself existed outside of measured time. Where science deals with delayed perception, spirituality might describe timeless connection. I see the two not as opposites, but as distinct lenses for describing one reality.

Whether my experience was a coincidence, an intuitive perception, or a glimpse of consciousness unfolding across time, it left me with one lasting belief: that what we call “the present moment” may be more fluid, layered, and mysterious than we think.

Would you like me to adapt this into a more conversational blog tone (for general readers) or keep it in this balanced narrative style suited for a talk or written article?
GOOGLE GEMINI:
The idea that the human experience involves a fundamental delay or a "photonic freeze" relative to a more immediate "real-time" reality is a concept that bridges the gap between quantum physics and the study of expanded consciousness. This framework suggests that what we perceive as the "present" might actually be a reconstruction of events that have already occurred within a broader, non-linear field of information.

Future Memory and Brain Shift

The phenomenon known as "future memory," explored by researchers like P.M.H. Atwater, describes sensory-rich experiences of future events that are later triggered by the actual physical occurrence. Unlike déjà vu, which feels like a shadow of the past, future memory is often described as a "brain shift"—a neural expansion where the mind registers a complete segment of reality before it physically manifests.
James Van Avery's research into this area developed techniques to cultivate this awareness through visualization and detail-tracking, suggesting that:
Imagination as a Probe: Visualizing what is behind objects or in rooms yet to be entered can build confidence in intuitive hunches.
Pattern Recognition: Trusting the imagination to describe shapes and forms of light and dark, rather than anticipating specific outcomes, helps in identifying "future" details.
Memory of the Future: By visualizing oneself further ahead than a target time and "remembering back" to the desired observation point, one might bypass the traditional linear flow of time.

The Physics of "All Paths" and Least Action

Modern physics supports the idea that the universe does not follow a single, predetermined trajectory. According to the Principle of Least Action and Richard Feynman’s path integral formulation, every particle—and by extension, every object—explores every possible path simultaneously.
Constructive Interference: We typically only see one well-defined path (the classical path) because the "amplitudes" of all other paths tend to cancel each other out through destructive interference.
Photonic Freeze: In this context, the physical reality we witness can be viewed as the "particle state" or a collapse of the waveform into a single correlation. The "waveform" itself exists at or above the speed of light, containing all possible paths at once.

Temporal Bleeding and Coexistence

The work of theoretical physicist Karen Barad introduces the concept of agential realism, where time is not a linear sequence of moments replacing one another, but an entanglement of past, present, and future.
Coexistence: Rather than times happening simultaneously, Barad suggests they "bleed" through one another. In this view, "yesterday, today, and tomorrow" coexist within the "hereness of here".
Iterative Reconfiguring: The past is never truly "finished," and the future is not simply what will unfold; instead, the world is a memory of its own iterative reconfiguring.

The Perceptual Delay Hypothesis

The hypothesis that the human point of view experiences a significant delay—perhaps on the scale of 30 days—proposes a scientific basis for precognition. This model suggests that while an event "actually" happens at the speed of light (the spiritual or waveform point of view), the brain takes time to construct the "movie" of that event for physical perception.
A specific mathematical correlation noted in this theory involves the Earth's movement:
Distance Travelled: In 30 days, the Earth travels approximately 50 million miles in its orbit.
Light Speed: Light takes roughly 4 to 5 minutes to cover that same 50-million-mile distance.
The Mirror Image: This delay may explain why precognitive experiences sometimes appear as "mirror images" of the actual event, requiring a mental "flip" to align with the eventual physical experience.
This perspective implies that the cosmos is essentially a "memory cloud"—a frozen path of light that we move through, with our awareness acting as the focus that determines which "frequency" or "path" we currently experience.
Related Resources:
Karen Barad: Undoing the Future
Something Strange Happens When You Trust Quantum Mechanics

SEARCH

Friday, February 6, 2026

Light follows ALL paths at the same time, ALL the time.